Metek sustainability statement
Sustainability in the context of construction is presented in terms
of various 'metrics' of environmental, social and economic performance.
In the UK, BREEAM is widely used for offices, and the Government's Code
for Sustainable Homes (CfSH) now replaces EcoHomes that has become the
environmental standard for use in the residential sector.
Although
voluntary at present, the CfSH will become mandatory in the future. An
EcoHomes 'Excellent' rating broadly corresponds to a 3* CfSH rating,
which will become the preferred standard for most housing and
residential projects.
LIGHT STEEL FRAMING TECHNOLOGY
The technology of light steel framing by Metek uses pre-fabricated
2D panels, and fl oor joists that are produced 'just in time' and
delivered to site as required, leading to minimum storage on site. They
are light enough to be manhandled into place and the panels are
screw-fi xed to each other using simple hand operated power tools.
The
accuracy of the manufacture is guaranteed by the FrameCAD design and
detailing package, which is linked to the industry-standard detailing
system, X-Steel, that contains the whole building model. Therefore,
detailing and manufacturing errors are eliminated and all components
fit together with minimum tolerances.
The sustainability assessment
of this technology is presented below in terms of various key
performance indicators that link to environmental criteria in the Code
for Sustainable Homes.
ENERGY AND CO2
The primary use of energy over the building's life is its
operational energy due to heating (and in some cases cooling). Low
U-values of less than 0.2 W/m2°C can be achieved by 'warm frame'
construction in which the majority of the insulation is placed
externally to the light steel frame and is supplemented by mineral wool
placed between the light steel members.
Steel framed buildings can
be designed to be very air-tight, with a leakage rate of less than
2m3/m2/hr, which would otherwise be a source of unwanted heat loss.
The operational energy of a house is 10-15 times more than the embodied energy in its materials over a 50-year design life span.
However,
light steel framing compares well with concrete or brick/blockwork
construction in terms of low embodied energy (see Table 1).
The
embodied energy of a light steel frame is estimated to be 26% less and
the carbon footprint 57% less than that of a concrete frame with
blockwork walls (excluding the cladding and fi nishes which are common
to both). Where required for higher-rise applications, a composite fl
oor supporting light steel infi ll walls is estimated to contain 2%
less embodied energy and 24% less in terms of carbon footprint than a
concrete frame.
MATERIALS
Light steel framing is by its nature lightweight, and the light
steel structure of a medium-rise residential building can weigh less
than 20% of that of an equivalent concrete frame (see table on back
page), and is even lighter than a timber frame. Other lightweight
materials used in this technology include various types of boards and
insulation.
Savings in foundation sizes can be significant when the
low weight of the light steel framework is taken into account, which is
very important on 'brown-fi eld' sites and poor ground, where concrete
in foundations can be reduced by up to 50% relative to brick and
blockwork.
WATER
The construction technology is essentially 'dry' and minimal water is required in manufacture.
Where a thin Gyvlon self-levelling screed is used, its water content is about 10%, which is held in the matrix of the material.
WASTE
Waste in traditional construction arises from various sources:
- Over-ordering to allow for site variations
- Damage and breakage and losses on site
- Re-work due to errors and inaccuracies
According to BRE, the construction industry average for material wastage on site is 13%.
In
comparison, waste is essentially eliminated by light steel framing
manufacture and installation. All off-cuts and drill swarfs are fully
recycled in the factory and site wastage is recycled. Nationally, 98%
of all steel is recycled after use and 50% of current steel manufacture
in Europe comes from recycled steel (scrap). No steel is sent to
landfill.
POLLUTION
Pollution on site is eliminated when using light steel technology, and all steel can be recycled efficiently after dismantling. Transportation of materials to site is reduced by 70% in comparison to brick and block construction, with a consequent reduction in traffic pollution.
Comparison of the embodied energy and carbon footprint of a typical 4-storey apartment building based on 4.5 m span and 2.8 m floor-floor height, excluding the cladding and finishes.
| Components | Materials weight kg/m2 floor area | Material embodied energy | Total embodied energy | Kg CO2:kg weight of material |
| Light steel framing | ||||
| Light steel frame | 75 | 22.0 | 660 | 1.34 |
| Plasterboard | 5 | 2.0 | 150 | 0.18 |
| Insulation | 5 | 30.0 | 150 | 1.80 |
| Chipboard | 12 | 35.0 | 420 | 0.40 |
| Totals | 122 | | 1380 | |
| Composite construction | ||||
| Steel frame | 45 | 18.0 | 810 | 1.01 |
| Infill walls | 5 | 22.0 | 110 | 1.01 |
| Concrete | 240 | 1.8 | 430 | 0.14 |
| Reinforcement | 3 | 13.0 | 40 | 0.92 |
| Decking | 10 | 22.0 | 220 | 1.34 |
| Fire protection | 7 | 14.0 | 100 | 1.40 |
| Plasterboard | 50 | 2.0 | 100 | 0.18 |
| Totals | 360 | | 1810 | |
| Concrete frame | ||||
| Concrete* | 600 | 1.8 | 1080 | 0.14 |
| Reinforcement | 35 | 13.0 | 455 | 0.92 |
| Blockwork | 150 | 1.4 | 210 | 0.20 |
| Plasterboard | 50 | 2.0 | 100 | 0.18 |
| Totals | 835 | 1845 | | |
*200 mm flat slab
The embodied energy and CO2 data are
taken from published sources and include appropriate recycling rates
for the various materials. Account may also be taken of the energy used
in vehicle movements and in equipment used on site, which will further
benefit the use of pre-fabricated construction technologies.